From: John Gallagher <gldrgidr@...>
Date: Sunday, October 3, 2010 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [BugHLG] Re: hello
Date: Sunday, October 3, 2010 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [BugHLG] Re: hello
The problem with the Mimi is that you have to know how to build light to get the
benefits of the more updated design. The original plans had a solid balsa wing
and resulted in very heavy gliders. For a glider in this span range, it must be
built light (under 5 ounces). There is a crude builtup version of the plans
available. Even using the built-up wing plans, most mimi's are coming out at
5.5 to 6.5 ounces. Most Gamblers are being built at around 6.5 ounces and that
is a 50" wingspan dlg. Since the Mimi is a design with a greater amount of
balsa, you need to purchase lightweight balsa (5#) from a balsa supplier that
specializes in selling lightweight balsa. You won't find this weight balsa from
the local hobby shop or Tower hobbies.
The Mimi builtup wing is not easier to build than the simplified wing structure
of the Bug.
I've got to admit that a light weight version of the Mimi would be a good dlg.
I may build one myself this winter.
Has anyone built a Bug with a different airfoil? The main update of the Mimi is
the AG airfoil.
John
________________________________
From: mgeo03 <geosmall@...>
To: BugHLG@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, October 3, 2010 7:02:36 AM
Subject: [BugHLG] Re: hello
Go with the MiMi at RCGroups. It is a more up to date design, easy to scratch
build.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]