From: "raincityflyer" <lewis08@...>
Date: Thursday, March 1, 2012 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: Bug Airfoil - Selig/Donovan SD8040
Date: Thursday, March 1, 2012 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: Bug Airfoil - Selig/Donovan SD8040
I've had good luck with Drela's AG 35-38 airfoils as they are flat bottomed and faceted on top for balsa construction and iron-on covering.
No worries about airfoil fidelity when you try to get your covering to stick to concave surfaces.
Cheers!
Chris in Seattle
--- In BugHLG@yahoogroups.com, John Gallagher <gldrgidr@...> wrote:
>
> If you have the original plans you see that the airfoil is the Selig 7014. This is a very popular airfoil.
> My suggistion was to reduce the thickness to around 8%.
> Â
> John
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Squid <littlefr2003@...>
> To: BugHLG@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2012 1:22 AM
> Subject: [BugHLG] Bug Airfoil - Selig/Donovan SD8040
>
>
> Â
> Hi Guys, another question. I have been doing allot of airfoil
> comparisons with the current bug airfoil.
> So far the closet i have found is Selig/Donovan SD8040
> <http://www.ae.illinois.edu/m-selig/ads/coord_database.html> . Ill try
> and upload a picture for you guys to have a look at. Maybe John while
> you are asking Carl about the legalities of me changing up his original
> design, (which im sure he would be happy to have his design evolve and
> be super stoked that there is such a cult following of his design) you
> could ask what airfoil he used?
> Also are there any suggestions for some variations in the airfoil?
> Thanks to every one out there for your input so far. It is all
> appreciated and its nice to no this is going out all over the world and
> hopefully it will be a good little boost to such a beautiful glider.
> Like Samson from Rc groups said "it looks like a piece of candy sitting
> next to my other models".
> Click here to view the Airfoil
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BugHLG/photos/album/520307090/pic/1466294142/view?picmode=&mode=tn&order=ordinal&start=1&count=20&dir=asc>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>