From: "Chris Lewis" <christopherlewis@...>
Date: Thursday, October 3, 2002 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: Wide Bug
Date: Thursday, October 3, 2002 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: Wide Bug
John - I added one rib to each side for the Lil' Bugger and used
the stock dihedral angle. To double check I just measured to the
first rib in from the tip instead. It flies great and I was still able to
get in at 3.5 ounces. For LB2 I'm going even wider (possibly 44")
and using a thinner, narrower chord AG 30 seiries airfoil. I hope
to have it finished to fly this weekend.
Chris
--- In BugHLG@y..., "John Gospodarek" <John.Gospodarek@i...>
wrote:
> Dan,
> I like the idea of the added strength so I built with the added rib
> on each side. I was going to adjust the tip height to allow for
the
> added length, but forgot. I ended up with a lower angle but I
> haven't noticed any major differences. The angle is not all that
> much different. The wing is bigger and thus turns a little wider
> (but not all that much). It may be hard to find someone who
has
> tried it both ways, and with different angles, so just give it a try
> and let us know. Good luck.
>
>
> --- In BugHLG@y..., "Dan" <danstrider@a...> wrote:
> > What is the consensus on how much dihedral to use for the
extended
> > wing? Plans call for 5 1/8" at the tip of the normal wing - are
> you
> > simply using the same angle?
> >
> > Has anyone noticed a difference in adding an extra set of
ribs
> > versus increasing the rib spacing? Besides wing strength
with the
> > extra ribs, would the airfoil be more consistent with more ribs
> > supporting the covering?
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > --- In BugHLG@y..., "John Gospodarek" <
John.Gospodarek@i...> wrote:
> > > Ya Allen You're right, that size of increase is not enough to
> need
> > > bigger feathers. I can notice that it is not quite as quick in
> the
> > > turns as the short wing but, I found the short wing was
almost
> to
> > > fast in the turns. With the bigger wing I fly much smoother.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In BugHLG@y..., Allan Wright <aew@m...> wrote:
> > > > Ahh, then the normal tail should have worked great. My
> extended
> > wing
> > > > bug ended up at 97cm and had plenty of rudder authority.
> > > >
> > > > Al
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Allen, I only added 5 in total.
> > > > >
> > > > > "I added right at five inches (the space between the 3rd
and
> > > > > 4th rib on both sides is +-2.5 inches). I made a copy of
> both
> > > wing
> > > > > sections and taped the third rib on one down over the
forth
> > rib
> > > on
> > > > > the other."
> > > > >
> > > > > I added one rib on both side and placed it at the
location
> of
> > the
> > > #4
> > > > > rib (pushing the #4 rib out). That added the space of
aprox.
> > 2.5
> > > in
> > > > > to each panel. That is about the same as what you
added I
> > think.
> > > five
> > > > > inches is about 12.5 cm. I left the tale and boom the
same.
> In
> > > fact I
> > > > > change the wings on the same fuse from the short to
the long
> > > > > depending on the day, wind, and lift. I used a little less
> > > dihedral
> > > > > than the plans called for by mistake. I did not have the
> wing
> > > tips
> > > > > set high enough when I glued the halfs together.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In BugHLG@y..., Allan Wright <aew@m...> wrote:
> > > > > > > I did it with out recalculation. I built the wing on the
> > copy
> > > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > plans and just installed the rod in the first and last
> > rib.
> > > Then
> > > > > I
> > > > > > > placed each rib flat on the plans and marked where
the
> rod
> > > > > crossed
> > > > > > > the rib to know the location of the hole. That way I
did
> > not
> > > > > decrease
> > > > > > > the strength of the wing with less ribs per/span.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > this is definately the right way to go if you're adding 5"
> > per
> > > > > panel. I
> > > > > > was more conservative and added about 6cm to each
panel
> with
> > > the
> > > > > same
> > > > > > ribs so I just stretched it out. I'm sure your wing has
> more
> > > area
> > > > > then
> > > > > > mind did and probably flys better.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Did you go ahead and increase the size of the V-tails
or
> > > lengthen
> > > > > the moment
> > > > > > arm (boom) a little to help with maneuverability? My
> > extended
> > > wing
> > > > > was so
> > > > > > slight of a change I didn't bother.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Al
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> ================================================
=====================
> > =
> > > > > =========
> > > > > > Allan Wright Jr. | Without love life's just a
> > long
> > > > > fight - Southside
> > > > > > University of New Hampshire +------------------------------
> --
> > ---
> > > ----
> > > > > -----------
> > > > > > Research Computing Center | WWI Modeling
mailing list:
> > > wwi@w...
> > > > > > Internet: aew@u... | WWI Modeling WWW Page:
> > > http://www.wwi-
> > > > > models.org
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> ================================================
=====================
> > =
> > > > > =========
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > > BugHLG-unsubscribe@y...
> > > > > Home Page - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/BugHLG/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ================================================
=====================
> > =
> > > =========
> > > > Allan Wright Jr. | Without love life's just a long
> > > fight - Southside
> > > > University of New Hampshire +----------------------------------
> --
> > ---
> > > -----------
> > > > Research Computing Center | WWI Modeling mailing
list:
> wwi@w...
> > > > Internet: aew@u... | WWI Modeling WWW Page:
> http://www.wwi-
> > > models.org
> > > >
> > >
> >
> ================================================
=====================
> > =
> > > =========